Assessing the impact of Connect 2 Care on the residential stability of homeless and vulnerably housed clients

Kyle Dewsnap; Hasham Kamran; Kimberly Rondeau; Alicia Polachek; Gabriel Fabreau; Kerry McBrien

doi:10.29173/aar107

Authors

Kyle Dewsnap 1W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Hasham Kamran W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kimberly Rondeau W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alicia Polachek W21C Research and Innovation Centre, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gabriel Fabreau, MD Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Kerry McBrien, MD Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/aar107

Keywords:

Homelessness, Unstable housing, Social Determinants of Health, Health Navigation, Health Outreach

Abstract

Background

Certain kinds of housing instability, such as foreclosure and homelessness, have been associated with poorer physical and mental health. The Connect 2 Care (C2C) program targets medically complex individuals who are unstably housed, primarily aimed at reducing acute care utilization and connecting clients to appropriate community-based care. However, because housing status is a fundamental determinant of health, the team also assists clients in finding permanent housing. As the C2C program aims to improve the health of its clients, we hope that this intervention positively impacts the housing stability of clients.

Objective

To determine whether the C2C program is effective in reducing factors of housing instability, such as the frequency of housing moves made, and time spent in unstable housing (such as shelters or sleeping outside).

Methods

C2C clients were asked to participate in 6- and 12- month follow-up surveys with a member of the research team. During both surveys, participants were prompted to describe their housing history using the Residential Time-Line Follow-Back (rTLFB) inventory. Starting at six months prior to their intake into C2C, participants created a twelve- to eighteen-month timeline that detailed their residential locations and number of housing transitions. Location descriptions provided by clients were categorized as stable, temporary, institutional, or literal homelessness. The number of housing transitions and the proportion of time spent in each housing category were then calculated for each individual. Changes in proportion of time spent over three unique time periods were evaluated using Wilcoxon’s paired rank test with Holm’s multiplicity correction.

Results

Since September 2018, housing data was collected from 100 unique clients. In comparing the six months preceding C2C intake with the six-to-twelve months after C2C intake, significant reductions in the amount of time spent in literal homelessness (p < 0.001) and reductions in the number of housing changes (p = 0.014) were observed.

Discussion

Housing stability for C2C clients improved after enrolment in the program. This study was potentially limited by incomplete sampling of the C2C population. Based on our findings, further research should be conducted in evaluating the relationship between increases in housing stability and increases of health status.

Acknowledgements

The C2C research team thanks Alberta Innovates and the Canadian Institute of Health Research for their financial support. The authors have no conflict of interests to state.